Gratis SEO Lokal
Bandingkan skor SEO antara situs Anda dan kompetitor secara berdampingan.
Identifikasi prioritas perbaikan dari perbedaan tingkat kategori.
Bandingkan hingga 6 situs — tersedia di paket Basic ke atas
Last updated: 2026-05-19
Competitor SEO analysis compares the SEO implementation of your site and competing sites — structured data, meta tags, technical SEO, and content — on a page-by-page basis under the same scoring criteria, identifying exactly what to improve to outrank them. Unlike the domain-wide analysis of Ahrefs and Semrush, visualizing page-level implementation gaps lets you move from diagnosis to fix actions immediately.
What is Competitor SEO Analysis?
An analysis method that diagnoses the SEO implementation status of your site and competing sites side by side under the same criteria, identifying on a per-page basis which category — structured data, basic SEO, content, or technical SEO — is creating the gap.
- Number of simultaneous comparisons
- Up to 6 sites (Pro) / Up to 3 sites (Basic)
- Comparison axes
- 4 categories of structured data, basic SEO, content, and technical SEO × 45+ items
- Analysis granularity
- Per-page (not entire domain)
- Output format
- Score table / per-category diffs / auto-generated fix code / PDF report (Pro)
- Time required
- Full multi-site diagnosis completes in about 30 to 60 seconds after entering URLs
- Re-run
- Any number of times, any time (diff tracking enabled)
Best for: Web production companies, freelancers, and in-house SEO personnel who want to understand specifically what to improve in order to rank higher than competitors.
Domain-level vs Page-level Analysis
Domain-level analysis (Ahrefs / Semrush, etc.)
Analyzes domain-wide indicators such as backlinks, estimated traffic, and keyword portfolios. Effective for market research and content strategy.
Page-level analysis (CodeQuest.work SEO)
Compares structured data, meta tags, and technical SEO implementation on a per-page basis. Surfaces concrete fix tasks ready for implementation.
Mengapa Analisis Kompetitor Penting untuk SEO
SEO bersifat relatif. Bahkan jika situs Anda mendapat skor baik, jika kompetitor mendapat skor lebih tinggi, mereka mendapat peringkat di atas Anda. Memahami skor SEO kompetitor memperjelas apa yang perlu diperbaiki untuk melampaui mereka.
Alat kami menjalankan diagnosis SEO hingga 6 situs secara bersamaan, membandingkan di 4 kategori dan 45+ item. Sempurna untuk proposal penjualan dan laporan pemeliharaan.
36.7% of URLs on the first page of Google search results implement structured data.
— Backlinko "We Analyzed 11.8 Million Google Search Results"（sumber）
Sites that focus on on-page improvements (meta tags, structured data, internal links) see an average organic traffic increase of 20%+ within 12 months.
— Ahrefs "How Long Does SEO Take"（sumber）
Google states in its official guide that optimizing for generative AI search is optimizing for search overall — in other words, SEO itself.
— Google Search Central "AI features and your website"（sumber）
Apa yang Diungkap Analisis Kompetitor
Kuantifikasi kesenjangan dengan kompetitor dan identifikasi perbaikan yang paling berdampak.
Perbandingan Skor SEO
Bandingkan skor SEO 100 poin secara berdampingan. Dapatkan gambaran menyeluruh performa SEO keseluruhan terhadap kompetitor.
Analisis Kategori
Bandingkan di 4 kategori: structured data, SEO dasar, konten, dan SEO teknis. Lihat kelemahan secara sekilas.
Perbandingan Domain Power
Bandingkan otoritas domain secara berdampingan. Lihat di mana tingkat kepercayaan domain Anda berada di industri Anda.
Identifikasi Prioritas
Temukan item di mana kompetitor mendapat skor tinggi dan Anda mendapat skor rendah. Fokus pada perbaikan paling efektif terlebih dahulu.
3 Steps to Extract Improvement Tasks from Competitor SEO Analysis
With the tool, a full multi-site diagnosis completes in 30 to 60 seconds, and improvement tasks become clear via the flow below.
- 1
Identify the top 3-6 competitors for your target keyword
Search Google for your target keyword and pick 3-6 URLs from the top results in your industry and at a similar scale. Exclude ad slots and aggregator sites (Yelp, etc.).
- 2
Visualize score gaps across 4 categories
Compare scores side-by-side across structured data, basic SEO, content, and technical SEO. Identify categories where competitors score high and you score low. Categories with a gap of 10+ points are top-priority candidates.
- 3
Apply the auto-generated fix code to ship the change
For unimplemented items, the diagnostic result automatically generates recommended HTML/JSON-LD code. Structured data is recommended as the first improvement — low implementation cost, high impact.
How Competitor SEO Tools Approach the Problem
Domain-level analysis tools and page-level analysis tools provide different information for different purposes. CodeQuest.work SEO is designed as a complement to Ahrefs/Semrush, not a replacement.
| Item perbandingan | CodeQuest.work SEO (page-level comparison) | Ahrefs / Semrush (domain-level analysis) |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis granularity | Per-page implementation diagnosis | Domain-wide backlinks and traffic estimates |
| Comparison checkpoints | 45+ items (structured data, meta tags, technical SEO) | Backlink count, DR, estimated traffic, keywords |
| Sites in parallel | Up to 6 (Pro) | 2-5 (plan-dependent) |
| Auto-generated fix code | Yes (outputs HTML/JSON-LD automatically) | No (issue list only) |
| Primary use case | Implementation fixes, sales pitches, maintenance reports | Market research, content strategy |
| Entry price | ¥2,980/mo (Basic — 3 sites compared) | $129/mo (Ahrefs Lite) |
Use Ahrefs/Semrush for domain-wide market research, and CodeQuest.work SEO for page-implementation fix tasks. For backlink databases and rank tracking, continue using Ahrefs/Semrush in parallel.
Examples of Actual Diffs You'll See
When you run a real comparison, the output is this specific.
| Category | Competitor A | Your site |
|---|---|---|
| Structured data | Article + FAQPage + BreadcrumbList implemented | WebPage only |
| Meta tags | OGP + Twitter Card + hreflang complete | OGP only |
| Content | 45 internal links, h1-h4 heading hierarchy | 12 internal links, h1-h2 only |
| Technical SEO (LCP) | 1.8s (good) | 3.2s (needs improvement) |
Who Is This Tool For?
Built for people who implement SEO fixes on the front line. For market analysis and content strategy, Ahrefs/Semrush are better fits.
Best for
- ▸Freelance web developers (for client pitches and maintenance reports)
- ▸In-house SEO at SMBs (improving owned sites)
- ▸Agency maintenance teams (recurring checks across multiple client sites)
- ▸Junior SEO consultants (learning implementation-level diagnostics)
Not ideal for
- ×Enterprise sites with 1M+ monthly PVs needing large-scale crawl
- ×Backlink analysis or rank tracking as the primary use case (use Ahrefs/Semrush)
Real-World Use Cases
Client pitch materials
Before pitching new business, compare the SEO scores of the prospect's site and 3-6 competitor sites. Visualize the "gap between current state and competitors" in numbers as evidence for your improvement proposal.
Output: Score comparison table + per-category diffs + PDF report (Pro)
Monthly maintenance reports
Run monthly diagnostics for maintenance contract clients and continuously track diffs against competitors. Visualize the impact of your implementation work over time.
Output: Monthly score trends + before/after diffs + competitor change report
Pre-launch competitor check
Before publishing a new article or LP, compare it side-by-side with the top 3-6 competing pages for your target keyword. Catch implementation gaps before going live.
Output: Checklist-style diff summary + ready-to-deploy fix code
Pricing
Competitor comparison is available on Basic and above. At about ¥2,980/mo, you can compare up to 3 sites simultaneously — roughly one-quarter the price of Ahrefs Lite ($129/mo).
3 pemeriksaan/bulan dengan registrasi
Untuk yang rutin memperbaiki situs
Untuk analisis SEO serius
Untuk situs besar & agensi
All plans in JPY, tax included. First 3 months 50% OFF campaign is currently running (code: X3WZHYEC).
Rekomendasi langkah selanjutnya
Alat pendamping untuk mengubah hasil ini menjadi langkah selanjutnya.
Bandingkan skor SEO dengan kompetitor
Cukup masukkan URL untuk memvisualisasikan kesenjangan dengan kompetitor. Prioritas perbaikan menjadi jelas.
About the author
Masakazu Imai(今井政和)
Executive Director / Frontend Engineer
20+ years in web development. Provides SEO, GA4, and WordPress development for freelancers and agencies. Developer of CodeQuest.work SEO. Author of "Sanpou-yoshi: Modern Web Strategy Learned from Edo Merchants" (Kindle).
Credentials
- Lancers Certified Outsourcing Director
- Samurai Engineer School Instructor
- MENTA Mentor